Ld5 wrote:Haulnarse wrote:islasmumma wrote:
Agreed, my second one is due 3 months before my daughter turns 3 and I cannot imagine having any less of an age gap (not saying it’s a bad thing for anyone who does and I’m sure there are many of you who do an amazing job at it) I personally just couldn’t handle it and I’m humble enough to admit it unlike these two twats who do not deserve 3 babies and will not put effort in to handle it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I had three in 3y6m. First two were 16mths apart - honestly it was probably an easier gap than our 2yr 3mth gap of the youngest two. But i couldnt imagine having twins and an 18mth old!!
If they brought the same ivf package, why didnt they just transfer one?? Do that a couple of times and then do two if no success.
I’m not 100% on this but I remember her saying something like the package they chose was cheaper than the one they had previously purchased (since they didn’t budget for a new IVF cycle) I’m not sure how it works but it made me believe that it was a one shot package whether it stuck or not. She was probably so full of herself that she had Emma that she didn’t think about the two other times she didn’t have a live birth.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I assumed that all their embryos are under the "free until a live birth" package and that they need to pay for any transfer after Emma, I don't think they got a new package as their still using the same 'set' of embryos.
I wouldn't think their package would restart every cycle? I think they would have the choice of new package after every egg retrieval/insemination/freezing embryos probably, but not just for new cycles using the same embryos.
I'm pretty sure they didn't pay for their first three transfers ( one didn't take, one was Brynn and then Emma) and now have to pay every future transfer because they had a live birth (Emma)
Sent from my SM-G610Y using Tapatalk